9
th
Annual SPHRIMH
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Program for Ethnicity, Culture, and Health Outcomes (
ECHO
)
8
th
Annual
SPHRIMH
Your guide to minority health-related activities at UNC-CH
and elsewhere
Participant Evaluation form
Site identification code
(please insert the Site ID that appears in parentheses immediately after the name for the site you attended (
view list of sites
; the SiteID is usually the 9-digit postal code for the viewing location. If you viewed the webcast, just say "web")
Participant Code
(4-digit number that you wrote on the attendance form)
Code number for CEU (if, applicable)
(announced immediately prior to each presentation)
If you would like your form to be entered into a drawing for a gift of appreciation, please enter your e-mail address (will be used ONLY for this purpose)?
Note: The information below will be analyzed separately from the information above.
Which day's session are you evaluating?
Mon.
Tue.
Wed.
Thu.
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
The presentation increased my understanding of this subject and the relationship to the general field of public health.
The topics covered today were important and relevant to the issue of minority health.
The technology worked well (clear sound, clear picture, etc.)
The facilitator at the site I attended helped things run smoothly.
I was able to ask questions easily during today's sessions
First speaker:
---please choose---
Congressional Minority Caucus Panel(Monday - 1st and 2nd session)
Bill Jenkins, Ph.D, M.P.H.(Tuesday - 1st session)
Gilbert C. Gee, Ph.D.(Wednesday - 1st session)
Ana F. Abraido-Lanza, Ph.D.(Thursday - 1st session)
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Overall, the speaker's address was appropriate for this session
The speaker presented in a clear and organized manner.
The speaker created a comfortable environment to elicit questions
The materials for the presentation were effective.
I learned material from this presentation that will help me in my research/work/study.
Second speaker:
---please choose---
Jennie R. Joe, Ph.D., M.P.H., M.A(Tuesday - 2nd session)
Judith B. Bradford, Ph.D.(Wednesday - 2nd session)
Jerome Wilson, MA, PhD(Thursday - 2nd session)
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Overall, the speaker's address was appropriate for this session
The speaker presented in a clear and organized manner.
The speaker created a comfortable environment to elicit questions
The materials for the presentation were effective.
I learned material from this presentation that will help me in my research/work/study.
16.
If this is the first day you are attending
the Videoconference, please tell us how you learned about it:
Minority Health Project web site (www.minority.unc.edu)
Other web site, please specify
Email from UNC-CH
Told (or e-mailed) by a friend or associate
Posted notice or poster
Professional organization's newsletter/journal
Flyer distributed at a conference
Other, please specify
17.
How many days of the Videoconference have you attended
(counting today)
?
1
2
3
4
18 . If this is the last day you will be attending
the Videoconference, please give us your overall evaluation:
Strongly
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Overall, the Videoconference was very valuable
I highly recommend the Videoconference.
21. Any comments about the speaker, topic, the web site, and anything else, including suggestions for future years?